No Wealthy Living Campus = No Funding Cuts for RESIDENT Programs at BCHD
BCHD claims that must be allowed to let a COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER build a 107.5-foot tall, nearly 300,000 sqft COMMERCIAL building on PUBLIC PROPERTY.
BCHD threatens to cut services if it can't use PUBLIC LAND for PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/13258d_6604dbd783c14c619a856bf0e0467c8f~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_638,h_143,al_c,q_85,enc_auto/13258d_6604dbd783c14c619a856bf0e0467c8f~mv2.png)
But the Wealthy Living Campus will service 80% to 95% NON-RESIDENTS
NEWS FLASH for BCHD - REQUIRE RESIDENCY FOR ALL SERVICES - MAGICALLY THERE WILL BE NO NEED FOR ANY CUTS!
BCHD doesn't even track how much it spends on the 30-40% non-resident members at the heavily taxpayer subsidized AdventurePlex or CHF.
BCHD's accounting show it lost $2.3M of taxpayer funds during Covid while it tested 84% non-residents.
So far .... taxpayers are on the hook for over $700K for allcove, and it's service area is 1.4M non-residents.
Comments